Skip to content

Cryptoentomology

September 11, 2009

Cryptozoology seems to be one of the current fads in TV these days.  There is Monster Quest on the History Channel, Destination Truth on the SciFi (Syfy?) Channel, and now it looks like MTV is putting togther a similar show.  I am somewhat of a sucker for these shows, but I prefer they have a greater dose of reality than science fiction.  I saw River Monsters for the first time last weekend and developed an immediate man-crush on the host, Jeremy Wade.  I’ve lways been fascinated by fish and other mysterious critters that lurk in lakes, ponds, rivers, streams, etc., even to the point of having strange dreams about them (I usually wake up just before it looks like I’m going to be eaten).  I think this comes from growing up in North Florida and spending a lot time around lakes and springs, but I’m not sure.  Maybe I was a minnow in a previous  life.

Anyway, these shows have got me thinking about about cryptozoological arthropods.  I couldn’t really think of any legendary spiders or insects, so I looked up the subject on the internet.  A quick search yielded a list of cryptids provided by the British Columbia Scientific Cryptozoology Club.  Out of a total of 724 cryptids, only three are what they call “insects.”  These are as follows: 1. Giant Centipede (USA) 2. Giant Spider (Various) 3. Madascan Hawk Moth.  Under “invertebrates” they also listed a Deep Sea Spider (S. Pac. Oc.), but that was the only other arthropod, so that makes a total of 4 out of 724 for a whopping 0.5%.  This seems strange since a conservative estimate of arthropod species puts them at 80% of all known animal species.  Surely there should be more stories of mythical insects and other exoskeletal beasties flaoting around out there.  I’ll have to do some more searching. 

One reason for the disparity between the number of insect/arthropod cryptids vs. other animals could be size.  Since the laws of physics, at least as we currently understand them, constrain arthropods from becoming collosal, perhaps stories of huge bugs are just too unbelievable.  I think the largest known terrestrial arthropod is the coconut crab.  They can be disturbingly large, but even they have their limits.  This is an interesting image of a cocount crab – supposedly taken at Andersen Air Force Base on the island of Guam (although Snopes.com reports that it was taken on Christmas Island). 

Coconut Crab

These crabs are huge, no doubt, but my personal opinion is that this image has been faked.  First of all, it seems improbable that a crab of that size would exist on an inhabited ilsand.  They are considered a delicacy, and where they coexist with people, they usually end up on a dinner plate before they can huge.  Even on the Island of Diego Garcia, where some of the largest coconut crabs in the world exist (B.I.O.T. law on D.G. makes it illegal to catch and eat them), you do not see coconut crabs of this size.  A coworker of mine did a study on the crabs there, so I could probably back this up with data if I had too.  Secondly, a crab this size would probably be too heavy to be supported by a standing trash can – in reality I think it would tip over from the weight of the crab. 

But getting back to the insects…there may not be too many tales of giant bugs roaming the earth, but I’m guessing there is no shortage of extremely rare insects that have been seen only once or a maybe a few times, or sightings of insects that are presumed extinct.  A particular species that comes to mind in Hawaii is the Green Sphinx of Kauai or Fabulous Green Sphinx, Tinostoma smaragditis (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae).  Only about a dozen specimens have ever been found, all from the Kokee region of Kauai.  The larvae have never been found, and its host plants have never been identified.  I am particularly interested in this moth because there is a good chance sometime later this year or early 2010 I will be participating in some surveys for endangered Hawaiian picture wing flies in Kokee.  You can bet I’ll also have my eyes peeled for the Green Sphinx.

About these ads
7 Comments leave one →
  1. Will Haines permalink
    November 4, 2009 4:16 am

    Another crypto insect would be the earwigfly, Merope tuber, related to scorpionflies. It’s North American, but rarely encountered, and the larvae are completely unknown.
    That coconut crab photo looks real to me, but it would definitely have to be a small trash can.

    • corycampora permalink
      November 9, 2009 9:21 pm

      Hi Will,
      I hadn’t heard of the earwigfly – thanks for the tip, its definitely a weird looking insect. As for the coconut crab picture, I think you’re correct. The picture is not doctored, but rather the mind assumes that the crab is on a 40 gallon trash can since there really isn’t anything else in there for scale – this makes the crab seem freakishly huge. I did a quick search on the internet and many models of plastic trash cans come in 10, 20, and 40 gallon sizes. The trash can in the photo cound very well be a smaller size. I think it would be interesting to try and replicate this effect with some other kind of critter, like maybe a cat or something.

  2. Brian permalink
    December 17, 2009 8:20 pm

    That picture is very real. I was stationed in Guam for 3 & 1/2 years and believe me they get that big (even on Guam). Although I didn’t perfom this duty while I was stationed there in the Navy. I received my degree in wildlife biology and conservation and was active in wildlife research on the island when I wasn’t on duty. That size specimen would be rare on Guam, but I can totally believe that it would possibly exist on Andersen AFB because everything on AAFB is protected. The locals and even AF personnel are not allowed to take any wildlife from that base and there are many places on base that are not accessed by humans where an animal that size could find safety from crab hunters. Second, you can see it’s a female because she is carrying her eggs underneath her. The females get absolutely enormous. You can see the front left claw beginning to peel back the lid and the third left leg hooked to the handle. It would take some really good photo shop to do that kind of scale, lighting and positioning. It is also not uncommon for residents of Guam to put stones or cinderblocks in the bottom of the trash can to keep wind and wildlife from tipping it over and if it was also filled with trash like most of them are because trash pickup is not that frequent then it could hold the weight.

  3. March 5, 2010 1:03 pm

    I think the photo is genuine, but the deceptive. A smaller than usual trash can makes the animal look bigger.

    http://arthropoda.wordpress.com/2010/01/05/arthropods-in-pop-culture-trashcan-crab/

    • corycampora permalink
      March 6, 2010 8:17 am

      Yeah, I’ve changed my mind about this photo since I originally wrote this post. Probably a smaller than normal trash can. Nice job explaining it at your Arthropoda site – I like the chart.

Trackbacks

  1. Why do cryptozoologists hate arthropods? « Arthropoda
  2. Why do cryptozoologists hate arthropods? « Scotch and Chocolate

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: